The ESWG recommends that states standardize requirements for CVIs, and that for NAIS compliance, horses be identified with the ISO/ANSI compatible RFID chip, implanted in the nuchal ligament on the left side in the middle third of the neck, halfway between the ears and the withers. The ESWG also recommended that official identification is necessary when a horse is transported to any premises where a brand inspection, CVI, VS 127 permit, or international certificate of veterinary inspection is required.
Edited press releaseThe Equine Species Working Group made recommendations Aug. 1 to the National Animal Identification System subcommittee on how the equine industry might reach NAIS compliance in the future. Each of the different species working groups report to the NAIS subcommittee, which in turn reports to the secretary of agriculture's advisory committee on foreign animal and poultry diseases. The two focal points of the ESWG report were movement and identification.The ESWG was created to review the NAIS and the possible participation of the horse industry in the program, should it become mandatory in the future. The ESWG is committed to developing recommendations for a national equine identification plan, which is in the best interests of, and protects the rights of horse owners and breeders. Reportable movements are a major concern and topic of discussion with the ESWG. Because of the extensive daily movement of horses not only intra- and interstate, but internationally, the ESWG decided to focus on those horses that are at the greatest risk of being exposed to and/or spreading disease. In recognizing the heavy burden that would be placed on horse owners or premises managers/owners by a reporting mechanism, it was recommended by the ESWG that the horse industry continue to rely on current regulatory mechanisms in place for horses that move. These regulations that require a brand inspection, certificate of veterinary inspection, VS-127 Permit, or international CVI prior to movement will serve as the starting point for trace back in the event of a disease outbreak."The recommendation not to report any equine movements was one that went through much discussion, and one that we feel is very important," said ESWG co-chair Dr. Marvin Beeman. "Although it may not achieve the ideal goal of the NAIS, the current practices will cover those horses at the greatest risk. It is the most practical solution at this time, as there will be no additional burden placed on horse owners or premises owners and managers." Each of the previously mentioned regulatory documents are kept and maintained in the state/country of origin, the state/country of destination, or both. Each document contains information about the horse's point of origin and its point of destination. In the event of a disease concern, federal and state animal health officials would be able to access that information. Most importantly, with the exception of the one-time official identification of the horse, these are practices currently being met by horse owners that move their horses, and therefore will not require the establishment of new business practices in the industry. The other focus of the ESWG report was equine identification. Standardization of the identification practices in the horse industry is a major focus of the ESWG. With standardization, the horse industry could ensure that the impact of an equine disease emergency would be quickly managed and controlled to benefit the veterinary welfare of the horse, and re-establish normal movements as soon as possible.